- CMP INSERT INTO WORD UPDATE
- CMP INSERT INTO WORD FULL
- CMP INSERT INTO WORD REGISTRATION
- CMP INSERT INTO WORD CODE
For reasons ofĬompleteness and consistency the type EncryptedValue has beenĮxchanged in all occurrences in RFC 4210. RFC 4211 offers theĮncryptedKey structure, a choice of EncryptedValue andĮnvelopedData for migration to EnvelopedData. The EncryptedValue structure has been deprecated in favor of theĮnvelopedData structure. Note thatĪccording to RFC 4211 section 2.1. * Offering EnvelopedData as the preferred choice next toĮncryptedValue to better support crypto agility in CMP. Use cases, e.g., batch processing of messages. * Extend the description of multiple protection to cover additional
CMP INSERT INTO WORD REGISTRATION
Registration authority and certification authority, to express theĪuthorization of the entity identified in the certificateĬontaining the respective extended key usage extension to act as * Add new extended key usages for various CMP server types, e.g., Insert this section at the end of the current Section 1: References to the original sections in RFC 4210 are used They are always related to the base specification. The following subsection describes feature updates to RFC 4210 Updates to RFC 4210 - Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) 2.1. An identifier for the EE is given as its subjectĢ. The KGA could be co-located with an RA or a CA.ĮE: End entity, a user, device, or service that holds a PKIĬertificate. KGA: Key generation authority, which generates key pairs on behalf RA: Registration authority, an optional system component to which aĬA delegates certificate management functions such as The following key wordsĬA: Certification authority, which issues certificates. Technical terminology is used in conformance with RFC 4210 , when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in thisĭocument are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", This document also introduces new extended key usages to identify CMPĮndpoints on registration and certification authorities. Means to be flexible to react on future advances in cryptography. RFC 4210 and RFC 6712 to overcome theseĪmong others, this document improves the crypto agility of CMP, which Identified in the original CMP specification. While using CMP in industrial and IoT environments and 20 Brockhaus & von Oheimb Expires 5 November 2021 Updates to RFC 6712 - HTTP Transfer for the Certificate
CMP INSERT INTO WORD UPDATE
Update Appendix C - Request Message BehavioralĬlarifications. Update Appendix B - The Use of Revocation Passphrase. Update Section 5.3.22 - Polling Request and Response. New Section 5.3.19.16 - Certificate Request Template. New Section 5.3.19.15 - Root CA Certificate Update. Replace Section 5.1.3.4 - Multiple Protection. Updates to RFC 4210 - Certificate Management Protocol Provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.ġ.
CMP INSERT INTO WORD CODE
Code ComponentsĮxtracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License textĪs described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rightsĪnd restrictions with respect to this document. Provisions Relating to IETF Documents ( license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
This Internet-Draft will expire on 5 November 2021.Ĭopyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as theīrockhaus & von Oheimb Expires 5 November 2021 Material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six monthsĪnd may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any Note that other groups may also distribute Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
CMP INSERT INTO WORD FULL
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the To properly differentiate the support of EnvelopedData instead ofĮncryptedValue, the CMP version 3 is introduced in case a transaction Types, extended key usages to identify certificates for use with CMP, Improving the crypto agility, as well as adding new general message Instead of EncryptedValue, clarifying the handling of p10cr messages,
The aspects of CMP updated in this document are using EnvelopedData Of Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) version 2. This document contains a set of updates to the syntax and transport Updates: 4210, 5912, 6712 (if approved) SiemensĬertificate Management Protocol (CMP) Updates draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-10